Yesterday, I was talking
to a friend of my father about the recent problems faced by our village
school, where I had my education. Among the many issues he shared, one
caught my full attention. An ST student has stopped coming to school,
and the headmaster has been visiting the student's house for several
days to convince the parents to send the student back.
It
is possible that the parents are making the student work or that they
have decided to send their child to another school. The headmaster is in
the dark, as the parents are either not at home or avoiding him
whenever he visits their home.
Why is
the headmaster so worried? Because his higher-ups are threatening to
take strict action against him if students drop out, particularly those
from marginalized communities. Of course, the higher-ups of his
higher-ups are pressuring them to stop dropouts, and so on.
That brings us to the question: should the parents or the government be responsible for a child's welfare? In
my view, holding a headmaster accountable for a dropout case is absurd.
If we accept that the government has the authority to decide the future
of every child, bureaucrats will gain the power to harass either the
parents or the headmaster.
The
vast majority of parents care about a child's future much more than any
government. Of course, there are rare instances where parents neglect
their children. However, concerned local citizens should come forward to
take responsibility and help the parents. I am not saying the
government should have no role in education, but it should be the last
one to take responsibility in such matters.
Saturday, 19 April 2025
Whose responsibilty is a child's education?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment